圖書內容簡介

本書收集的38篇案例是從1996年至2016年二十年間上海浦東新區人民法院審結的8000余件知識產權案件中精選而來，主要由浦東法院審判經驗豐富的知識產權法官撰寫，具有一定的代表性、典型性和指導性。案件類型覆蓋著作權、商標權、不正當競爭等民事案件以及知識產權刑事、行政案件，集中展示了浦東法院知識產權審判的思路和水平。

圖書目錄

"目錄

一、著作權民事糾紛案件

服裝樣板可以作為圖形作品受到著作權法保護


——上海錦禾防護用品有限公司等訴顧菁等著作權侵權糾紛案/

匯編作品著作權和版式權的界定及權利范圍


——《中國學術期刊（光盤版）》電子雜志社訴趙萍萍等侵犯匯編作品
著作權案/

破壞軟件技術保護措施構成侵犯軟件著作權


——地創公司、萬格公司訴北京萬戶公司等侵犯計算機軟件著作權糾紛案/

最終用戶軟件侵權案件中的證據保全


——微軟公司訴大眾保險股份有限公司侵犯計算機軟件著作權糾紛案/

網絡服務提供者適用“避風港”規則的要件分析


——北京書生網絡技術有限公司訴上海玄霆娛樂信息科技有限公司侵害
作品信息網絡傳播權糾紛案/

大賽主辦方對獲獎作品不侵害他人著作權負有合理注意義務


——錢琦訴香格里拉飯店管理（上海）有限公司等著作權權屬、侵權糾紛案/

手機閱讀軟件搜索接口服務的性質認定及法律責任


——袁騰飛訴上海第九城市信息技術有限公司侵害作品信息網絡傳播權
糾紛案/

展臺設計圖的作品歸類與著作權保護


——上海九加建筑裝飾工程有限公司訴廣州世泰服飾發展有限公司等
侵害作品發行權、復制權、展覽權糾紛案/

判定美術作品間是否構成實質性相似的基本方法


——艾影（上海）商貿有限公司訴上海丫丫信息科技有限公司等侵害作品復制權、改編權糾紛案/

二、商標民事糾紛案件

處理權利沖突不能機械適用保護在先原則


——上海海外進出口有限公司訴上海頂新箱包有限公司商標侵權糾紛案/

“FOR VOLVO”與商標合理使用


——沃爾沃商標控股有限公司訴瑞安市長生濾清器有限公司商標侵權
糾紛案/

馳名商標認定應堅持權利主張地原則


——彭博有限合伙公司訴上海澎博財經資訊有限公司等商標侵權糾紛案/

對游戲名稱的合理使用不構成商標侵權


——大宇資訊股份有限公司訴上海盛大網絡發展有限公司商標侵權糾紛案/

知名商標的功能不僅在于識別還在于表彰


——古喬古希股份公司訴森達公司等侵犯商標專用權糾紛案/

網絡交易平臺經營者幫助侵權的司法認定


——衣念（上海）時裝貿易有限公司訴浙江淘寶網絡有限公司等侵害
商標權糾紛案/

次商標的侵權判斷及賠償金額的認定


——利惠公司訴杭州洪業服飾有限公司、堅持我的服飾（杭州）有限公司等侵害商標權糾紛案/

標注引人誤解的真實信息亦可構成商標侵權或不正當競爭


——艾歐史密斯（中國）熱水器有限公司訴廣州史密斯電器有限公司等
商標侵權、不正當競爭糾紛案/

網絡銷售環境中商標淡化侵權行為的司法認定


——卡地亞國際有限公司訴北京夢克拉科技有限公司等侵害商標權
及不正當競爭糾紛案/

確認不侵權之訴與行政處理不可并行


——蘇州國信集團旺順進出口有限公司訴特制自行車配件有限公司確認
不侵害商標權糾紛案/

在先使用有一定影響的未注冊商標可在原范圍內繼續使用


——合肥伍伍壹網絡科技服務有限公司訴上海拍拍貸金融信息服務有限
公司侵害商標權糾紛案/

三、不正當競爭民事糾紛案件

即發侵權與知識產權保護


——上海索迪斯服務有限公司訴上海創造食品科技有限公司不正當競爭糾紛案/

商業秘密侵權案件原告必須提交商業秘密載體


——上海運城制版有限公司訴上海希爾彩印制版有限公司、陳言平商業
秘密侵權糾紛案/

商業秘密中的特定客戶應當保持長期穩定交易關系


——圣路易凱威（上海）國際貿易有限公司訴朱露春等不正當競爭糾紛案/

同業競爭者未履行法定的作為義務致使競爭對手的商業信譽受到損害構成
不正當競爭


——美聯物業顧問（上海）有限公司訴上海房產之窗房地產信息有限公司損害（競爭對手）商業信譽、商品聲譽糾紛案/

知名商品特有裝潢“特有性”的認定


——上海健生實業股份有限公司訴武漢瑪麗文化用品有限公司、上海晨光文具禮品連鎖經營有限公司侵害作品復制權、發行權、擅自使用知名
商品特有裝潢糾紛案/

具有第二含義的通用名稱的成立要件及其保護


——上海人才網（集團）有限公司訴上海創匯信息科技有限公司擅自使用他人企業名稱糾紛案/

具有一定知名度的企業名稱簡稱應視為企業名稱予以保護


——上海精密科學儀器有限公司訴上海精學科學儀器有限公司、成都科析儀器成套有限公司擅自使用他人企業名稱糾紛案/

自由競爭與不正當競爭行為的法律界限


——北京鑫秀偉燁科技發展有限公司訴上�？妄R集信息技術有限公司
不正當競爭糾紛案/

影視劇植入廣告的辨識及虛假宣傳的認定


——北京珂蘭信鉆網絡科技有限公司訴上海辛迪加影視有限公司、上海
卓美珠寶有限公司虛假宣傳不正當競爭糾紛案/

仿冒注冊商標、企業字號以侵害經營秘密應分別規制手段行為和結果行為


——派諾特貿易（深圳）有限公司訴上海派若特國際貿易有限公司、仇剛
侵害商標權及不正當競爭糾紛案/

四、知識產權刑事案件

虛假出資成立公司后個人以公司名義經營的應以個人犯罪論處


——唐興成、吳文紅假冒注冊商標案/

修改數據獲得網絡游戲武器裝備不構成侵犯計算機軟件著作權


——王一輝、金珂、湯明職務侵占案/

為他人運營“私服”提供幫助的以共同犯罪論處


——上海龍聯信息技術有限公司、陳某某侵犯著作權罪案/

篡改軟件著作權人的開放式許可協議屬于司法解釋規定的未經著作權人許可


——徐楚風、姜海宇侵犯著作權罪案/

“寬嚴相濟”在特殊社會形勢下的充分運用


——譚天等銷售假冒注冊商標的商品罪案/

非法制造注冊商標標識罪的認定及量刑


——葛玉龍等非法制造注冊商標標識案/

披露型侵犯商業秘密罪中權利人損失的認定


——吳廣侵犯商業秘密罪案/

五、知識產權行政案件

工商行政處罰中網頁證據的取證規范及證明力判斷


——上海加酷貿易有限公司不服上海市工商行政管理局機場分局工商
行政處罰決定案/









｜浦東法院知識產權精品案例集



Catalogue｜







Catalogue




Ⅰ Civil Dispute Cases over Copyright

Garment Patterns Entitled to Protection by the Copyright Law as Graphic Works


—Copyright Infringement Disputes between Shanghai Jinhe Protective Equipment Co., Ltd. et al. and Gu Jing et al./

Definitions and Limits of Collective Works�� Copyright and Format Right


—China Academic Journal (CD) Electronic Publishing House Suing Zhao Pingping et al. for Infringement upon Collective Works�� Copyright/

Sabotaging Technical Protection Measure for Software Constitutes Software Copyright Infringement


—Shanghai Dichuang Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v. Beijing Namex Media Science and Technology Co., Ltd.et al.Computer Software Copyright Infringement/

Evidence Preservation in Case of End User Infringing Software Right


—Microsoft Corporation v. Dazhong Insurance Co., Ltd. Computer Software Copyright Infringement/

Analysis of Requirements on Application of the“Safe Harbor” Rules to Network Service Providers


—Beijing Sursen Network Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information & Technology Co., Ltd. for Infringement of the Information Network Dissemination Right of the Works/

Contest Sponsor Has the Duty of Due Care to Ensure that the Awarded Works Do Not Infringe Another�餾 Copyright


—Qian Qi v. Shangri�睱a Hotel Management (Shanghai) Limited Company,et al.for Copyright Ownership and Infringement/

Determination on Search Interface Service of Mobile Phone Reading Software and Its Legal Liability


—Yuan Tengfei Suing Shanghai Ninth City Information Technology Co., Ltd. Case for Infringement upon Right to Network Dissemination of Information/

Classification and Copyright Protection of Booth Design Drawings


—Dispute over Infringement of the Rights of Works Publication, Reproduction and Exhibition: Shanghai Jiujia Building Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Shitai Garments Development Co., Ltd.et al./

Basic Methods to Judge Substantial Similarity between the Works of Fine Art


—Animation International Ltd. v. Shanghai Yaya Information Technology Co., Ltd.et al.for Infringement of Rights of Reproduction and Adaptation/

Ⅱ Civil Dispute Cases over Trademark

The First to Register Principle May Not Apply Mechanically in Handling Right Conflicts


—Shanghai Overseas Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Newest Luggage Co., Ltd. Trademark Infringement Case/

“FOR VOLVO” and Trademark Fair Use


—Trademark Infringement Dispute Case: Volvo Trademark Holding AB v. Rui�餫n Changsheng Oil Filters Co., Ltd./

Recognition of a Well�睰nown Trademark Should Follow the Principle of Place of Right


—Bloomberg L.P. v. Shanghai Pobo Financial Information Co., Ltd.,et al.Trademark Infringement Dispute/

The Fair Use of Game Name shall Not Constitute Trademark Infringement


—Softstar Entertainment Inc. v. Shanghai Shanda Interactive Development Co., Ltd.for Trademark Infringement/

Well�睰nown Trademark: Not Only for Recognition But Also Commendation


—GUCCIO GUCCI S.P.A.v. Senda Company, etc. for Trademark Infringement/

Judicial Determination of Contributory Infringement by Online Trade Platform Operator


—E·Land Fashion (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Taobao Network Co., Ltd.et al.Infringement on Exclusive Right to Use Trademarks/

Judgment on Infringement of Secondary Trademark and Determination on Compensation Amount


—LEVI STRAUSS & Co. v. Hangzhou HongYe Clothing Co., Ltd., JASONWOOD (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd., Zhongshan Shaxi RenXin Garment Factory, Shanghai XinNing Shopping Center Co., Ltd. for Trademark Infringement/

Authentic Information with Misleading Label May also Constitute Trademark Infringement or Unfair Competition


—A.O.Smith (China) Water Heater Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Smith Water Heater Co., Ltd.et al.for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition/

Judicial Determination of Trademark Diluted Infringement Act amid Network Sales


—Trademark Rights and Unfair Competition: Cartier International AG v. Beijing Mengkela Technology Co., Ltd. for Trademark Infringement/

Lawsuit on Affirmation of Non�睮nfringement Cannot Co�瞖xist with Administrative Settlement


—The Plaintiff Suzhou Guoxin Group Wangshun Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v. the Defendant Tailoring Bicycle Accessories Co., Ltd. Case on Affirmation of Not Infringing Trademark Right/

Precedent Used Unregistered Trademark with Certain Influence Could be Used Continually within the Original Scope of Use


—Hefei Wuwu Yi Network Technology Service Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai PPDAI Financial Information Service Co., Ltd. for Trademark Infringement/

Ⅲ Civil Dispute Cases Sover Unfair Competition

Imminent Infringement and Intellectual Property Protection


—Sodexo (Shanghai) Service Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Chuangzao Food Science & Technology Co., Ltd. for Unfair Competition/

Trade Secret Carrier is Required for the Plaintiff in the Trade Secret Infringement Case


—Shanghai YunCheng Plate�睲aking Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Xi�餰r Color Printing & Plate�睲aking Co., Ltd. and Chen Yanping for Trade Secret Infringement/

Specific Customers in Trade Secret Should Keep a Long�瞭erm Stable Trading Relationship


—St. Louis Gateway (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. v. Zhu Luchun,et al.Unfair Competition and Infringement Case/

Failure to Fulfill the Statutory Obligation to Act Which Has Damaged the Business Reputation of Competitor of the Same Business Shall Be Judged as Unfair Competition


—Midland Realty (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai ehomeday.com Limited for Damaging its Business Reputation, Commodity Fame (of its Competitor)/

“Peculiarity” Identification of Special Decoration of Well�睰nown Commodity


—Shanghai Jiansheng Industrial Co., Ltd. Suing Wuhan Maxleaf Stationery Co., Ltd., Shanghai Chenguang Stationery & Gift Chain Limited for Infringement upon Right of Reproduction and Distribution, and Unauthorized Use of Special Decoration of Well�睰nown Commodity/

Essential Elements for a Generic Name to Acquire Specific Second Meaning and its Protection


—Shanghai Talent Net (Group) Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Chuanghui Information and Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Unauthorized Use of Enterprise Names of Others/

Shortened Form of Enterprise Name with Certain Popularity Should Be Protected as Enterprise Name


—Shanghai Precision and Scientific Instrument Corporation v. Shanghai JingKe Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Chengdu Kexi Instrument Set Co., Ltd. for Unauthorized Use of Enterprise Name/

Legal Limits of Free Competition and Unfair Competition


—Beijing Xinxiu Weiye Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. Suing Shanghai Keqiji Information Technology Co., Ltd. for Unfair Competition/

Identification of Product Placement in Movies and Television Plays and Determination on False Propaganda


—Beijing Kela Diamond Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. China Syndication Entertainment Co., Ltd.,et al.Dispute over Unfair Competition/

Means and Behavior Results Should Be Respectively Regulated for Counterfeiting Registered Trademark and Trade Name to Infringe Trade Secrets


—Parrot Trading (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Parrot International Trade Co., Ltd. and Qiu Gang for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition/

Ⅳ Criminal Cases over Intellectual Property

An Individual Doing Business in the Name of a False Funded Company Shall Be Charged as Individual Crime


—Case of Registered Trademark Counterfeiting by Tang Xingcheng, Wu Wenhong/

It Shall Not Be Infringement of Computer Software Copyright to Obtain Online Game Weapons via Data Modification


—Case of Duty�瞨elated Encroachment by Defendants Wang Yihui, Jin Ke and Tang Ming/

Those Assisting Others in Operating “Private Server” Shall Be Punished for Joint Crime


—Crime of Copyright Infringement Committed by Shanghai Longlian Information and Technology Co., Ltd., Chen Hailong/

Tampering with the Open License Agreement of the Software Copyright Owner Falls into the“Without the Permission of the Copyright Owner” According to Judicial Interpretations


—Defendants Xu Chufeng, Jiang Haiyu Commit the Crime of Copyright Infringement/

Application of Criminal Policy“Tempering Justice with Mercy” in Protection of Intellectual Property


—Shanghai Changzheng Materials Co., Ltd.et al.Crime of Selling Commodities with Counterfeited Registered Trademark/

Ascertainment and Measurement of Penaltyon Illegal Manufacture of Registered Trademark


—Case of Illegally Manufacturing Registered Trademark by the Defendants Ge Yulong, etc./

Determination of Right Owner�餾 Losses in Crime of Trade Secret Infringement by Disclosure


—Wu Guang Crime of Trade Secret Infringement/

Ⅴ Administrative Cases over Intellectual Property

Evidence Collection Norms and Probative Force Determination of Web�瞤age Evidences in Administrative Punishment Imposed by the Administration for Industry & Commerce


—Shanghai Jiaku Trade Co., Ltd. Unsatisfied with the Administrative Penalty Decision of Airport Branch of Shanghai Administration for Industry and Commerce/


后記/

Afterword/